THE GLENELG SHIELD
  • Home
  • News
  • Features
  • Sports
  • A&E and society
  • Opinions
  • The Forum
  • Shield Staff 24-25
  • 24-25 School Event Photos
  • The Glad Challenge with Ademide Shodunke
  • Coffeehouse

NEWS

Court Rulings of Interest

6/8/2018

 
By Julie Amoss

The Supreme Court is probably the most well known institution of America’s judicial branch, revered for its power in setting legal precedents that can last for centuries. Although many of its rulings affect the more obscure parts of industries or the legal system, some of them affect everyone in America. This is a list of some of the rulings most likely to impact students at Glenelg.


Byrd v. the United States: For anyone renting a car, this case is a win for you. The court ruled in a unanimous decision that anyone driving a rental car—as long as it was legally obtained, of course—has the right to refuse a request to search it. Previously, it has been understand that anyone owning a car had to consent to a search without probable cause, but this protection has only just been extended to rentals. This ruling should help future drivers rest easy, regardless of if they own their car or not.

DC v. Wesby: The worst-case scenario of attending a party is when it ends in arrests. When a party was interrupted after a noise complaint and the partygoers were arrested for supposedly trespassing, this case posed an interesting question: did the police have probable cause to enter  home where this party was occurring in the first place? In a 9-0 decision, the court ruled that they did. The court also decided that the officers involved in the case were effectively immune because they did not do anything illegal.

Marinello v. US: A common opinion about this ruling is that it’s “ridiculous,” as articulated by Sophomore Abby Jones, but it an important ruling to know about nonetheless.  
A little tip to all future taxpayers: if you don’t know the IRS is coming after you for tax fraud, you technically aren’t in violation of the law. A new ruling requires proof that someone who committed tax fraud knew beforehand that they would be punished for their actions. This is an interesting ruling because it essentially pardons ignorance in tax code violations. Time will tell if this will increase the number of defendants being acquitted in cases like this or not.

Although most of these cases impact adults, it is still important for teenagers soon to be adults on their own to understand rulings like the ones mentioned above, for they could easily affect them a few years down the road. Additionally, going to parties like the one mentioned in DC v. Wesby and having a rental car situation similar to Byrd v. the United States  will be relatively common experiences for young adults. Three fourths of adults are also defendants in a trial, even for something as simple as a speeding ticket (Marinello v. US). The world of the legal system can be a scary place, so good luck out there, everyone. Try not to knowingly commit tax fraud.

Comments are closed.

    Archives

    December 2024
    February 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    December 2022
    October 2022
    May 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    November 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016

Features
Sports
A&E
News
Opinions
​Media
Club Spotlight
Staff
Contact Us
  • Home
  • News
  • Features
  • Sports
  • A&E and society
  • Opinions
  • The Forum
  • Shield Staff 24-25
  • 24-25 School Event Photos
  • The Glad Challenge with Ademide Shodunke
  • Coffeehouse